The Fallacy of Multiple Methods
Year:
2015Published in:
Comparative Politics NewsletterPolitical scientists are trained to identify logical fallacies, yet as a subfield, comparativists have fallen victim to a pernicious failure of reasoning, one that I will call the fallacy of multiple methods. The fallacy goes like this: Comparative politics maximizes its understanding of the political world when multiple methods are employed; therefore, graduate students in comparative politics should produce work that employs multiple methods. To understand why this is a fallacy, it is helpful to unpack the argument into its constituent parts.The premise of the statement, in my view, is on firm ground. Ethnographic and interpretive work offers deep insight into the motivations and understandings of particular political actors. Statistics gives us the tools to make statements of more or less confidence about populations of political actors or governing entities. Experimental research identifies causal relationships that are otherwise difficult or impossible to observe. Game theory provides a language for understanding the strategic interaction that is often central to politics. One could go on. The point is that the diversity of methods in comparative politics exists for a reason.
Related by author
50 publications found
What Can Firm and Household Surveys Tell Us About Expert Assessments of Corruption?
Publisher: University of Wisconsin–Madison
Authors: Scott Gehlbach
Did Mass Privatisation Really Increase Post‑Communist Mortality?
Publisher: The Lancet
Authors: Scott Gehlbach, John S. Earle
A Formal Model of Exit and Voice
Publisher: Rationality and Society
Authors: Scott Gehlbach
Electoral Institutions and the National Provision of Local Public Goods
Publisher: SSRN
Authors: Scott Gehlbach
Social Networks and Corruption
Publisher: Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association
Authors: Scott Gehlbach
Correlates of forest‑cover change in European Russia, 1989–2012
Publisher: Land Use Policy
Authors: Scott Gehlbach, Delgerjargal Uvsh, Catalina Munteanu, Peter V. Potapov, Eugenia V. Bragina, Volker C. Radeloff
Taxability and Government Support of Business Activity: Testing Theories of Social‑Contract Failure
Publisher: University of California
Authors: Scott Gehlbach
The Tocqueville Paradox: When Does Reform Provoke Rebellion?
Publisher: SSRN
Authors: Scott Gehlbach, Evgeny Finkel
Reform and Rebellion in Weak States
Publisher: Cambridge University Pres
Authors: Scott Gehlbach, Evgeny Finkel
Formal Models Of Domestic Politics
Publisher: University of Chicago
Authors: Scott Gehlbach