Journal article

Did Mass Privatisation Really Increase Post-Communist Mortality?

Year:

2010

Published in:

The Lancet
mass privatisation
adult mortality
post-communist countries
replication study
former Soviet Union

David Stuckler and colleagues1 claim that mass privatisation of enterprises was “a crucial determinant of differences in adult mortality trends in post-communist countries”. We attempted to replicate their results and found that the relationship is not robust. Here we summarise our findings, which are expanded in a webappendix. Because Stuckler and colleagues do not find a positive correlation between privatisation and mortality in central and eastern Europe, but only in the former Soviet Union, we focus on the latter set of countries. In our replication we carried out three simple checks. First, by examining the data used by Stuckler and colleagues, we found inconsistencies between the published description of their dummy variable measuring “implementation of mass privatisation”—one of two privatisation measures used in the paper—and the coding of this variable. We therefore created a new variable coded precisely as described in the article (“a jump from 1 to 3 on the EBRD large-scale privatisation index”), and we re-estimated Stuckler and colleagues' model using this corrected measure. Second, because an instantaneous effect of privatisation on mortality is implausible, we re-estimated the model assuming short lags (1 or 2 years) between policy changes and mortality. Third, we controlled for differences across countries in long-term mortality trends, a common statistical method (indeed, one used by Stuckler and colleagues in other work2). The results, shown in the table, demonstrate that any one of these changes substantially weakens the positive correlation between privatisation and mortality reported by Stuckler and colleagues, and a combination of any two changes eliminates it entirely. Indeed, the estimated effect of privatisation on mortality is negative when assuming 2-year lags and controlling for trends. Although the correct functional form is unknown, one could as easily conclude that privatisation lowered as raised mortality in the former Soviet Union.

Other publications by

52 publications found

2015
Journal article

Does Reform Prevent Rebellion? Evidence From Russia’s Emancipation of the Serfs

Publisher: Comparative Political Studies

Authors: Scott Gehlbach, Evgeny Finkel, Tricia D. Olsen

2014
Book Chapter

The Grand Experiment That Wasn’t?

Publisher: Cambridge University Pres

Authors: Scott Gehlbach, Edmund J. Malesky

2019
Working paper

Preventing Predation: Oligarchs, Obfuscation, And Political Connections

Publisher: SSRN

Authors: Solomiya Shpak, John S. Earle, Scott Gehlbach, Anton Shirikov

2015
Working paper

Is Privatization Working In Ukraine? New Estimates From Comprehensive Manufacturing Firm Data, 1989‑2013

Publisher: IZA Institute for Labor Economics

Authors: Solomiya Shpak, J. David Brown, John S. Earle, Volodymyr Vakhitov

2016
Journal article

Is Putin’ Popularity Real?

Publisher: Post-Soviet Affairs

Authors: Scott Gehlbach, Timothy Frye, Kyle L. Marquardt, Ora John Reuter

2010
Journal article

The Contribution of Veto Players to Economic Reform

Publisher: The Journal of Politics

Authors: Scott Gehlbach, Edmund J. Malesky

2023
Journal article

Damaged Collateral And Firm‑Level Finance: Evidence From Russia’s War In Ukraine

Publisher: Journal of Comparative Economics

Authors: Solomiya Shpak, John S. Earle, Scott Gehlbach, Mariia Panga

2019
Working paper

Obfuscating Ownership

Publisher: The National Science Foundation

Authors: Solomiya Shpak, John S. Earle, Scott Gehlbach, Anton Shirikov

2011
Journal article

Did Post‑communist Privatization Increase Mortality?

Publisher: The Journal of Comparative Economic Studies

Authors: Scott Gehlbach, John S. Earle

2016
Journal article

Formal Models of Nondemocratic Politics

Publisher: Annual Review of Political Science

Authors: Scott Gehlbach, Konstantin Sonin, Milan W. Svolik