Raising Hell: On The Hyper-Projectivity Of Slurs
Year:
2022Published in:
Amsterdam ColloquiumMere mentions of a slur have the potential to do harm, assaulting a listener, perpetuating marginalization of oppressed groups, and solidifying oppressive practices. Whereas most projective meanings, such as presuppositions, are typically assumed to be blocked by quotation, some effects of slurs are found even when the slur is quoted. In this sense, slurs are hyper-projective. Our goal is to explain why. The material here is drawn from: David Beaver and Jason Stanley, The Politics of Language, Princeton University Press (in press), primarily from Chapter 10, “Oppressive Speech.”
Related by author
56 publications found
Truth And Metatheory In Frege
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Authors: Jason Stanley
Skill
Publisher: Noûs
Authors: Jason Stanley, Timothy Williamson
Quantifiers And Context‑Dependence
Publisher: Analysis
Authors: Jason Stanley, Timothy Williamson
Constructing Meanings
Publisher: Analysis
Authors: Jason Stanley
On The Case For Contextualism
Publisher: University of Michigan
Authors: Jason Stanley
Is Epistemology Tainted?
Publisher: Disputatio
Authors: Jason Stanley
Knowing How
Publisher: The Journal of Philosophy
Authors: Jason Stanley, Timothy Williamson
II—Jason Stanley: Hornsby On The Phenomenology Of Speech
Publisher: The Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume
Authors: Jason Stanley, Jennifer Hornsby
Pragmatics And Context: The Development Of Intensional Semantics
Publisher: Routledge
Authors: Jason Stanley
Banning Ideas And Authors Is Not A ‘Culture War’ – It’s Fascism
Publisher: The Guardian
Authors: Jason Stanley