Raising Hell: On The Hyper-Projectivity Of Slurs
Year:
2022Published in:
Amsterdam ColloquiumMere mentions of a slur have the potential to do harm, assaulting a listener, perpetuating marginalization of oppressed groups, and solidifying oppressive practices. Whereas most projective meanings, such as presuppositions, are typically assumed to be blocked by quotation, some effects of slurs are found even when the slur is quoted. In this sense, slurs are hyper-projective. Our goal is to explain why. The material here is drawn from: David Beaver and Jason Stanley, The Politics of Language, Princeton University Press (in press), primarily from Chapter 10, “Oppressive Speech.”
Related by author
56 publications found
Knowing How
Publisher: The Journal of Philosophy
Authors: Jason Stanley, Timothy Williamson
Skill
Publisher: Noûs
Authors: Jason Stanley, Timothy Williamson
Truth And Metatheory In Frege
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Authors: Jason Stanley
Empirical Tests Of Interest‑Relative Invariantism
Publisher: Episteme
Authors: Jason Stanley, Chandra Sekhar Sripada
Toward A Non‑Ideal Philosophy Of Language
Publisher: Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal
Authors: Jason Stanley, David Beaver
Quantifiers And Context‑Dependence
Publisher: Analysis
Authors: Jason Stanley, Timothy Williamson
Is Epistemology Tainted?
Publisher: Disputatio
Authors: Jason Stanley
How Fascism Works: The Politics Of Us And Them
Publisher: Random House
Authors: Jason Stanley
Semantic Knowledge And Practical Knowledge
Publisher: Aristotelian Society
Authors: Jason Stanley
The Politics Of Language
Publisher: Princeton University Press
Authors: Jason Stanley, David Beaver