Fallibilism And Concessive Knowledge Attributions
Year:
2005Published in:
AnalysisIf you claim that S knows that P, and yet you grant that S cannot eliminate a certain possibility in which not-P, it certainly seems as if you have granted that S does not after all know that P. To speak of fallible knowledge, of knowledge despite uneliminated possibility of error, just sounds contradictory.
Related by author
56 publications found
Truth And Metatheory In Frege
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Authors: Jason Stanley
Skill
Publisher: Noûs
Authors: Jason Stanley, Timothy Williamson
Quantifiers And Context‑Dependence
Publisher: Analysis
Authors: Jason Stanley, Timothy Williamson
Constructing Meanings
Publisher: Analysis
Authors: Jason Stanley
On The Case For Contextualism
Publisher: University of Michigan
Authors: Jason Stanley
Is Epistemology Tainted?
Publisher: Disputatio
Authors: Jason Stanley
Knowing How
Publisher: The Journal of Philosophy
Authors: Jason Stanley, Timothy Williamson
II—Jason Stanley: Hornsby On The Phenomenology Of Speech
Publisher: The Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume
Authors: Jason Stanley, Jennifer Hornsby
Pragmatics And Context: The Development Of Intensional Semantics
Publisher: Routledge
Authors: Jason Stanley
Banning Ideas And Authors Is Not A ‘Culture War’ – It’s Fascism
Publisher: The Guardian
Authors: Jason Stanley