Fallibilism And Concessive Knowledge Attributions
Year:
2005Published in:
AnalysisIf you claim that S knows that P, and yet you grant that S cannot eliminate a certain possibility in which not-P, it certainly seems as if you have granted that S does not after all know that P. To speak of fallible knowledge, of knowledge despite uneliminated possibility of error, just sounds contradictory.
Related by author
56 publications found
Knowing How
Publisher: The Journal of Philosophy
Authors: Jason Stanley, Timothy Williamson
Skill
Publisher: Noûs
Authors: Jason Stanley, Timothy Williamson
Truth And Metatheory In Frege
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Authors: Jason Stanley
Empirical Tests Of Interest‑Relative Invariantism
Publisher: Episteme
Authors: Jason Stanley, Chandra Sekhar Sripada
Toward A Non‑Ideal Philosophy Of Language
Publisher: Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal
Authors: Jason Stanley, David Beaver
Quantifiers And Context‑Dependence
Publisher: Analysis
Authors: Jason Stanley, Timothy Williamson
Is Epistemology Tainted?
Publisher: Disputatio
Authors: Jason Stanley
How Fascism Works: The Politics Of Us And Them
Publisher: Random House
Authors: Jason Stanley
Semantic Knowledge And Practical Knowledge
Publisher: Aristotelian Society
Authors: Jason Stanley
The Politics Of Language
Publisher: Princeton University Press
Authors: Jason Stanley, David Beaver